OUTLINE for an AFFIRMATIVE Lincoln-Douglas Debate Case (6.
To start with, I will focus on how to write the case, or the initial structure as to why your side of the debate is right. Then, I will look at rebuttal preparations. After that, I will go over the structure of LD Debate. Case. In LD Debate, the case is the first item each side of the resolution must work on.
Sample Affirmative Case (Death Penalty topic) I affirm the resolution that “A just society ought not use the death penalty as a form of punishment.” My value today is Justice. Justice is defined simply and traditionally as giving each their due. Justice within the context of today’s debate can be seen as solely.
You will debate each side of the resolution at every tournament. If you are for the resolution, you are affirmative; if you are against it, you are negative. The format of the round is as follows: 1. Affirmative Constructive-6 min-Aff. reads his case 2. Negative Cross Examination-3 min-Neg questions Aff 3.
In a debate, both sides write constructive speeches that cover the topic of the debate. Whatever the topic of the debate is, there will be a positive and negative side; this does not refer to the.
What to Expect Competing in Lincoln-Douglas Debate Lincoln-Douglas Debate (LD) is a one-on-one debate event. Topics range from individual freedom versus the collective good to economic development versus environmental protection. Students may consult evidence gathered prior to the debate. An entire debate is roughly 45 minutes and consists of.
Template for debate speaches (view more resources at moneysmart.gov.au). Our third s peaker will rebut the negative team and sum up our team case. Rebuttal; There is no rebuttal for the first affirmative speaker. Arguments. . During the debate write a reason why what your opposition’s second speaker has.
The parameters of the debate are set up by the debaters within the framework of their case. Those parameters are what debaters call value and criteria. The problem is that more often than not, the affirmative sets up a value and criteria, then the negative sets up a counter value and counter-criteria and that’s it- the discussion of the issue ends.